Saturday, April 11, 2009

1305 Obama - Mr Magoo

By ELIZABETH WURTZEL



Anyone who toils in the legal-industrial complex -- better known as Big Law -- should be able to tell you how we got here. Corporate attorneys like me, even those with the eyesight and insight of Mr. Magoo, all should have been able to see this financial collapse coming.

The market has lost a dozen years worth of wealth in a matter of months. Millions of hours of manpower put in by investment bankers on Wall Street and the lawyers who enabled them -- the kind that brought home those bright shiny bonuses that are now causing a populist uprising in the hinterlands -- have been wasted away by what is kindly called the credit crisis. And whatever lessons the powers that be might learn from this adjustment -- that salary structure should change, or that the billable hour is an anachronism -- it seems no one has stated the obvious: The whole system is warped.

These days, deals are down. It's so quiet that even at mergers-and-acquisitions hothouses like Cleary Gottlieb and Skadden Arps, junior associates have been known to sneak out of the office and head home by six o'clock. Exposed to the sunshine that exists outside of corporate skyscrapers for the first time, these people now know what we've all been telling them for years: The sky is actually blue.

But daylight savings time notwithstanding, the traditional life of a law lackey -- even, or especially, a graduate of a fancy law school like Harvard or Yale -- has meant virtual residence at the firm. Meals were delivered by Seamless Web and the roll-top desk was used for catnaps, because whatever it is that had to happen had to happen immediately, or yesterday. The emergency-room atmosphere that permeated the processing of derivatives deals, corporate takeovers, and whatever else has been going on at Goldman, Bear, Citi and Merrill for the past decade, could rival that of an operating room during open-heart surgery. Only, of course, it was a matter of money -- not life or death.

Perhaps money and mortality are all the same to some. But as a way of making the former, this hysterical ER-approach has proved futile. All those lost nights of sleep are now lost 401(k)s. So what was the point? Corporate lawyers could have been sunning in St. Bart's and ended up with the exact same result, plus a tan.

Money made the mad hours worth it. This is why the insanity of working as if the very fate of nations were at stake when it was actually just about whether or not to do a leveraged buyout of, say, a company in Decatur, Ill., went unnoticed by an entire industry.

Anyone in a position to criticize this inhuman work ethic -- meaning, anyone who liked sleeping, or dating, or occasionally walking his own golden retriever -- opted out instead. These are the people who are now attorneys in the public sector, who run nonprofit organizations, or who simply made what money they could and are now painting landscapes in Taos, or skiing full-time in Sun Valley.

The Wall Street atmosphere -- in both law offices and investment banks -- is not open to dissenting opinion. If you blow the whistle, it's only to hail a taxi to take you away, because complaining is just not tolerated. So anyone sharp enough to say that these deals were a bad idea in the first place didn't stay on long enough to make the point. And we all know that organizations that don't retain thoughtful opposing views are doomed by hubris. Hello, Lehman Brothers!

Still, I don't believe any of the major players are re-evaluating their ethos -- only their decision to invest in subprime mortgages. And this is foolish, since the problem is not just that the financial instruments were bad bets, but that the corporate structure and the feverish rush of it all are fundamentally flawed.

I would love to call the system despicable or detestable or something evil-sounding, but that would be giving it too much credit. It's really just the march of dunces.

A dozen years worth of sleepless nights down the drain like dirty bathwater. Pity these people.

Thursday, April 9, 2009

1307 Obama - Gulliver

Rick Wagner Wednesday, April 08, 2009
Normally it would not seem the United States Constitution and Lemuel Gulliver would have much in common, but this fictional character and our bedrock document of government have received similar treatment.
Just as our traveler, Gulliver, was a giant in the land of Lilliputians, so our Constitution is in our Republic. And, as Gulliver was restrained as he slept by tiny men to bend him to their own purposes, such has been the recent treatment of our founding document.
Jonathan Swift’s character in Gulliver was written as political and social satire and, while the context of the era may have lapsed, the messages still ring true.
In the annals of history, the United States Constitution and its framers loom as giants. Many of their interpreters are diminutive in comparison, but they seem forever busy turning the Constitution from a great shield for the citizen to a sword for the activist.
Jurists seeking to insert substantive due process into the document and let judges discover rights not written, but divined by their interpretation, threw the first silken cords. A case in 1967 supplied a fragment of language that serves as the jumping off point for this misapplied reasoning, as the Supreme Court quite reasonably struck down a law from the Jim Crow era outlawing marriage between different races as being antithetical to the clause guaranteeing equal protection under the law. Toward the end of the decision, the court added language that marriage was a substantive right.
This implied that there were rights granted individuals beyond those named by the Constitution, which could be interpreted from a meaning given to the language of the document. This gave rise to future courts interpreting “shadow” rights that were often used as battering rams against social norms.
This interpretation of “shadow” rights most famously is found in the decision of Roe v. Wade, preventing the states from interposing legal barriers to abortion on the grounds that such action would violate the court’s discovery of a fundamental and substantive right to privacy in the Constitution.
This decision is often misunderstood to be about whether the Supreme Court views abortion as legal. The question actually is whether a right to privacy exists that can be interpreted to prevent the states from deciding if abortion should be legal or regulated within their individual boundaries.
Employing a visioning process that discovers intentions beyond the pen of the author, and elevates them to be substantive and fundamental, makes it nearly impossible for the states or the citizenry to affect their exercise.
This becomes important as we consider one of President Obama’s first judicial nominations.
David Hamilton presently is a trial court judge at the federal level whom the president wishes to elevate to the appellate court in Chicago. Judge Hamilton’s interpretation of the right to privacy and substantive due process has led to him to declare unconstitutional a law to require convicted sex offenders to allow authorities access to their personal computers.
The New York Times noted that the judge, in his decision, felt that the amendment cut into the heart of a person’s right to privacy in his home. He added, “The ability of the individual to retreat into his home and therefore to be free from unreasonable intrusion by the government stands at the very core” of constitutional protections against unreasonable searches.
This makes a jumble of whether a search is reasonable within the sanctity of one’s home, a possibility that clearly exists within the Constitution, by placing it in an almost subservient role to a right to privacy, which has only been interpreted to exist in the Constitution.
Such a view is troubling to those who believe the framers knew what they meant and were capable of deciding if a right to privacy was important enough to be written into the Constitution and placed upon the same level as the Bill of Rights’ prohibition against unreasonable search and seizure.
I hope that those who treasure the genius of our Constitution do not sleep like Gulliver.

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

1308 Obama - Grid Spies

Electricity Grid in U.S. Penetrated By Spies, Wall Street Journal

WASHINGTON --

Cyberspies have penetrated the U.S. electrical grid and left behind software programs that could be used to disrupt the system, according to current and former national-security officials.

The spies came from China, Russia and other countries, these officials said, and were believed to be on a mission to navigate the U.S. electrical system and its controls. The intruders haven't sought to damage the power grid or other key infrastructure, but officials warned they could try during a crisis or war.

"The Chinese have attempted to map our infrastructure, such as the electrical grid," said a senior intelligence official. "So have the Russians."

The espionage appeared pervasive across the U.S. and doesn't target a particular company or region, said a former Department of Homeland Security official. "There are intrusions, and they are growing," the former official said, referring to electrical systems. "There were a lot last year."

Many of the intrusions were detected not by the companies in charge of the infrastructure but by U.S. intelligence agencies, officials said. Intelligence officials worry about cyber attackers taking control of electrical facilities, a nuclear power plant or financial networks via the Internet.

Authorities investigating the intrusions have found software tools left behind that could be used to destroy infrastructure components, the senior intelligence official said. He added, "If we go to war with them, they will try to turn them on."

Officials said water, sewage and other infrastructure systems also were at risk.

...

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

1309 Obama - Dashboard

you too can have one of these ($12.95 American - made in China)

Saturday, April 4, 2009

1312 Obama - Sunlight

Steve's speech June 22, 2007, Manchester NH

On or near that day he said it with different words



7 Broken Promises in Record Time

  1. Make government open and transparent.
  2. Make it "impossible" for Congressmen to slip in pork barrel projects.
  3. Meetings where laws are written will be more open to the public. (Even Congressional Republicans shut out.)
  4. No more secrecy.
  5. Public will have 5 days to look at a bill.
  6. You’ll know what’s in it.
  7. We will put every pork barrel project online.

Thursday, April 2, 2009

1314 Obama - Colmes is ON




From Red Square to the shores of Havana, from San Francisco all the way to Berkley, and from the West Village to the Upper West Side, Colmes is on. Tonight we are live at Mount Rushmore where the final touches are being put on Barrack Obama’s face after just 72 days in office. Then, what do republicans hate as much as poor people – furry little animals (and we have the video to prove it). Plus Al Gore says Ann Coulter is to blame for global warming – so it must be true. And an emotional retrospective of the life and work of Noam Chomsky. All that plus the anti-American panel: tonight featuring Bill Ayers, Sean Penn and anybody from France. Grab you hammer and sickle – Colmes starts right now. … Got ya!

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

1315 Obama - Nice motel

London, April 1, 2009

Steve and Michele spent a quiet night in a quaint London motel last night. The room was specially decorated with a bust of Winston Churchill for the President of the United States. In addition, a fruit basket of region 1 DVDs was place on the TV. It is rumored that Steve brought his own region 1 DVD player.

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

1316 Obama - Tea

GJ tea party
GJ tea party




City: Grand Junction
When: April 15, 12:00pm - 1:30pm
Where: 12th street and North Avenue
Contact: EMAIL


Monday, March 30, 2009

1317 Obama - Tax Advice

letter to Senator Harkin, D-IA

Dear Senator Harkin,

As a native Iowan and excellent customer of the Internal Revenue Service, I am writing to ask for your assistance. I have contacted the Department of Homeland Security in an effort to determine the process for becoming an illegal alien and they referred me to you.

My primary reason for wishing to change my status from U.S. Citizen to illegal alien stems from the bill which was recently passed by the Senate and for which you voted. If my understanding of this bill's provisions is accurate, as an illegal alien who has been in the United States for five years, all I need to do to become a citizen is to pay a $2,000 fine and income taxes for three of the last five years. I know a good deal when I see one and I am anxious to get the process started before every one figures it out.

Simply put, those of us who have been here legally have had to pay taxes every year so I'm excited about the prospect of avoiding two years of taxes in return for paying a $2,000 fine. Is there any way that I can apply to be illegal retroactively?

This would yield an excellent result for me and my family because we paid heavy taxes in 2004 and 2005.

Additionally, as an illegal alien I could begin using the local emergency room as my primary health care provider. Once I have stopped paying premiums for medical insurance, my accountant figures I could save almost $10,000 a year.

Another benefit in gaining illegal status would be that my daughter would receive preferential treatment relative to her law school applications, as well as "in-state" tuition rates for many colleges throughout the United States for my son.

Lastly, I understand that illegal status would relieve me of the burden of renewing my driver's license and making those burdensome car insurance premiums. This is very important to me given that I still have college age children driving my car.

If you would provide me with an outline of the process to become illegal (retroactively if possible) and copies of the necessary forms, I would be most appreciative.

Thank you for your assistance.

Your Loyal Constituent,
Donald Ruppert
Burlington, IA

Friday, March 27, 2009

1320 Obama - replace PM w/ POTUS ??

U.K. MEP Daniel Hannan: Transcript of His Attack on Gordon Brown

Prime Minister, I see you’ve already mastered the essential craft of the European politician, namely the ability to say one thing in this chamber and a very different thing to your home electorate. You’ve spoken here about free trade, and amen to that. Who would have guessed, listening to you just now, that you were the author of the phrase ‘British jobs for British workers’ and that you have subsidised, where you have not nationalised outright, swathes of our economy, including the car industry and many of the banks? Perhaps you would have more moral authority in this house if your actions matched your words? Perhaps you would have more legitimacy in the councils of the world if the United Kingdom were not going into this recession in the worst condition of any G20 country?

The truth, Prime Minister, is that you have run out of our money. The country as a whole is now in negative equity. Every British child is born owing around £20,000. Servicing the interest on that debt is going to cost more than educating the child. Now, once again today you try to spread the blame around; you spoke about an international recession, international crisis. Well, it is true that we are all sailing together into the squalls. But not every vessel in the convoy is in the same dilapidated condition. Other ships used the good years to caulk their hulls and clear their rigging; in other words – to pay off debt. But you used the good years to raise borrowing yet further. As a consequence, under your captaincy, our hull is pressed deep into the water line under the accumulated weight of your debt We are now running a deficit that touches 10% of GDP, an almost unbelievable figure. More than Pakistan, more than Hungary; countries where the IMF have already been called in. Now, it’s not that you’re not apologising; like everyone else I have long accepted that you’re pathologically incapable of accepting responsibility for these things. It’s that you’re carrying on, wilfully worsening our situation, wantonly spending what little we have left. Last year - in the last twelve months – a hundred thousand private sector jobs have been lost and yet you created thirty thousand public sector jobs.

Prime Minister, you cannot carry on for ever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecedented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt. And when you repeat, in that wooden and perfunctory way, that our situation is better than others, that we’re ‘well-placed to weather the storm’, I have to tell you that you sound like a Brezhnev-era apparatchik giving the party line. You know, and we know, and you know that we know that it’s nonsense! Everyone knows that Britain is worse off than any other country as we go into these hard times. The IMF has said so; the European Commission has said so; the markets have said so – which is why our currency has devalued by thirty percent. And soon the voters too will get their chance to say so. They can see what the markets have already seen: that you are the devalued Prime Minister of a devalued government.

Thursday, March 26, 2009

1321 Obama - Bait and switch

Meet Larry, the dead fish, aka government printing $1 trillion and monetizing our debt


So what was in the news? Steve's bracket picks ....

Steve's rage at AIG bonuses ...

Steve debuts on Leno ....

citizens wanting to lynch AIG citiznes

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

1322 Obama - TOTUS/POTUS

President Obama's press conference transcript, March 24, 2009



baracksteleprompter.blogspot.com






BARACK OBAMA'S
TELEPROMPTER'S BLOG


REFLECTIONS FROM THE HARD DRIVE OF THE MACHINE
THAT ENABLES THE VOICE OF THE LEADER OF THE
FREE WORLD


Tuesday, March 24, 2009

1323 Obama - One with nature

GJ daily sentinel, March 24, 2009

Humans must give up all to truly preserve nature

Stop it now! All this energy production is ruining our environment and it has to stop.

Everything we humans do is bad for the Earth and must stop. Turn off your electricity, turn off your natural gas, stop buying gasoline, diesel, kerosene, and jet fuel. And since farming and manufacturing are bad for the environment too, no more manufactured goods or food. The only option we have to protect Mother Earth is to become one with nature and let nature replenish.

Sexual reproduction spreads disease, leads to birth defects, overpopulation and promotes pornography. Run wild with the bears and the birds. Compete one on one for your food and shelter. No guns allowed either. Guns are evil.

But our intelligence is still and unfair advantage, so I suggest that we all become politicians. Only then will we be well suited to drive ourselves to extinction and the Earth will survive.

Lonnie Smith
Grand Junction

Monday, March 23, 2009

1324 Obama - Cupboards Bare

Rush claims he went from right 98.9% of the time to right 99% of the time.

Well, here's one thing he's right about - 46% of the US people did not vote for Steve. And they're buying stuff.



Sportsman's warehouse Feb. 2009

Saturday, March 21, 2009

Friday, March 20, 2009

1327 Obama - AIG smoke screen

Glenn Beck

I've been telling you for weeks to not be distracted by the "big news of the day" because it's usually just a smokescreen. But on Wednesday, I fell for it myself.

While everyone — including me — was taking sides on the AIG bonuses, something much more important was happening: The Fed announced it will pump a $1 trillion into the system by buying debt from our treasury.
....

That last line of defense was just hung over "patient America" yesterday, but we were all — and that includes me — too focused on AIG to notice.

Here's what this means: We're borrowing money from ourselves to pay for programs we can't pay for.

And that's why the price of gold shot up about 75 bucks in 18 hours. Investors aren't stupid. They know the risks this poses, especially to inflation and our dollar.

video clip





Thursday, March 19, 2009

1328 Obama - Ayn Rand

Wall Street Journal

by Yaron Brook

Ayn Rand died more than a quarter of a century ago, yet her name appears regularly in discussions of our current economic turmoil. Pundits including Rush Limbaugh and Rick Santelli urge listeners to read her books, and her magnum opus, "Atlas Shrugged," is selling at a faster rate today than at any time during its 51-year history.

There's a reason. In "Atlas," Rand tells the story of the U.S. economy crumbling under the weight of crushing government interventions and regulations. Meanwhile, blaming greed and the free market, Washington responds with more controls that only deepen the crisis. Sound familiar?

The novel's eerily prophetic nature is no coincidence. "If you understand the dominant philosophy of a society," Rand wrote elsewhere in "Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal," "you can predict its course." Economic crises and runaway government power grabs don't just happen by themselves; they are the product of the philosophical ideas prevalent in a society -- particularly its dominant moral ideas.

Why do we accept the budget-busting costs of a welfare state? Because it implements the moral ideal of self-sacrifice to the needy. Why do so few protest the endless regulatory burdens placed on businessmen? Because businessmen are pursuing their self-interest, which we have been taught is dangerous and immoral. Why did the government go on a crusade to promote "affordable housing," which meant forcing banks to make loans to unqualified home buyers? Because we believe people need to be homeowners, whether or not they can afford to pay for houses.

The message is always the same: "Selfishness is evil; sacrifice for the needs of others is good." But Rand said this message is wrong -- selfishness, rather than being evil, is a virtue. By this she did not mean exploiting others à la Bernie Madoff. Selfishness -- that is, concern with one's genuine, long-range interest -- she wrote, required a man to think, to produce, and to prosper by trading with others voluntarily to mutual benefit.

Rand also noted that only an ethic of rational selfishness can justify the pursuit of profit that is the basis of capitalism -- and that so long as self-interest is tainted by moral suspicion, the profit motive will continue to take the rap for every imaginable (or imagined) social ill and economic disaster. Just look how our present crisis has been attributed to the free market instead of government intervention -- and how proposed solutions inevitably involve yet more government intervention to rein in the pursuit of self-interest.

Rand offered us a way out -- to fight for a morality of rational self-interest, and for capitalism, the system which is its expression. And that is the source of her relevance today.

Dr. Brook is president and executive director of the Ayn Rand Institute.

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

1329 Obama - more chump change

Almost the same chump change as the bonuses, but no outrage. Well, Dodd actually said this: "Naturally, I knew nothing about this, and I’m now seething with anger at the injustice.” SURE!! Chrissy

from ScrappleFace

AIG, which has received $170 billion in taxpayer cash from the federal government since September, gave more than $585,000 to Congressional and presidential candidates last year, favoring Democrats 3-to-1 over Republicans.

President Obama and Sen. Dodd were the two largest recipients of campaign contributions from the beleaguered company, and the only politicians to garner six-figure amounts from AIG in 2008 — $103,100 for Sen. Dodd and $100,332 for presidential candidate Obama.